Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2009 01166
Original file (BC 2009 01166.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01166 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

1. His DD Form 214, Certificate of Discharge or Release from Active 
Duty, be updated to reflect the survival school training course. 

 

2. He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). 

 

3. He be awarded the Armed Forces Reserve Medal (AFResM). 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He flew as part of the flight crew with the 50th TAS into the 
Philippines in support of the war operations. He is not surprised 
that the government does not have any documentation to support the 
22 different countries they flew into; however, he has horrible 
memories from each mission’s experience. The mission duration that 
was flown into Saigon lasted minutes or hours as they only had time 
to load, get shot at and fly out as they avoided mortar rounds on 
the runway. He is trying to establish boots on the ground in 
Vietnam. He is also having a problem joining the Veterans of 
Foreign War (VFW); he was a member of an Illinois VFW in 1997. 

 

In support of his request, applicant provides a copy of NA Form 
13059, Transmittal of and/or Entitlement to Awards, a copy of 
AF Form 973, Request and Authorization for Change of Administrative 
Orders, and a personal statement. 

 

His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant entered into the Regular Air Force on 28 Jun 73. He 
was progressively promoted to the grade of airman first class (E-
3), having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank of 
28 Jun 74. He received an honorable discharge on 13 Apr 76 after 
serving on active duty for 2 years, 9 months, and 16 days. 

 

The applicant’s Airman Performance Report (APR) shows he 
participated in a variety of missions, including TDY to South 
America and the Philippines during the reporting period of 29 Jun 
74 thru 28 Jun 75. 


 

In Aug 94, AFMPC/DPMASA acknowledged the applicant as being 
entitled to the National Defense Service Medal. DPMASA also stated 
after further research into the applicant’s official personnel 
records, they were unable to substantiate his entitlement to any 
other medals. The applicant was not on active duty during the 
period for award of the medals requested. 

 

The VSM criterion: The VSM was created by Executive Order 11213, 
8 Jul 65. It is awarded to all service members of the Armed Forces 
who between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73, served in the following areas 
of Southeast Asia: In Vietnam and contiguous waters and airspace; 
in Thailand, Laos or Cambodia or the airspace thereof and in the 
direct support of military operations in Vietnam. 

 

The AFResM criterion: The AFResM is awarded to any service member 
or former service member of the Reserve components of the U.S. 
Armed Forces who completes or has completed a total of 10 years of 
honorable and satisfactory military service in one or more Reserve 
components of the Armed Forces. 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of any Vietnam service awards. DPAPP 
states they were unable to prove the applicant had boots on the 
ground in Vietnam. According to the governing AFI, “the applicant 
has the burden of providing sufficient evidence of probable 
material error or injustice.” Based on the lack of evidence, DPAPP 
cannot support his request. 

 

The DPAPP complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the Vietnam service awards and the 
AFResM. DPSIDR states they were unable to verify the applicant’s 
time in Vietnam. DPSIDR also states they cannot support his 
request for award of the AFResM because he did not serve the 
minimum time necessary to qualify for this award. 

 

The DPSIDR complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

AFPC/DPSIT recommends denying documenting basic survival training 
school attendance as a part of his training on his DD Form 214. 
DPSIT states they requested additional documentation from the 
applicant to prove he attended and completed this course; however, 
he could not provide such evidence. 

 

The DPSIT complete evaluation is at Exhibit E. 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 


A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 20 Nov 09 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, this office has received no response. 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice with regard to the 
applicant’s requests for award of the VSM and AFResM. The 
applicant has not provided any documentary evidence to 
substantiate his claim that he is entitled to the VSM or AFResM. 
Therefore, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of 
AFPC/DPAPP and AFPC/DPSIDR, and adopt their rationale as the basis 
for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an 
error or injustice. With respect to the applicant’s request that 
he be credited with completing the USAF Survival School (SERE); 
based on the applicant’s assertion and the fact that the SERE 
course is mandatory for all aircrew members, we have no reason to 
doubt his entitlement. Consequently, we believe the benefit of 
the doubt should be made in his favor. Therefore, we recommend 
his records be corrected as indicated below. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that effective 
13 April 1976 his DD Form 214, Certifcate of Discharge or Release 
from Active Duty, reflected he completed the S-V80-A Survival, 
Escape, Resistance and Evasion Course. 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2009-01166 in Executive Session on 7 Jan 10, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

, Panel Chair 

, Member 

, Member 

The following documentary evidence for Docket Number BC-2009-01166 
was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Mar 09, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 


 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 11 Sep 09. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 22 Sep 09. 

 Exhibit E. AFPC/DPSIT, dated 19 Nov 09. 

 Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Nov 09. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01166

    Original file (BC-2009-01166.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01166 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). DPSIDR also states they cannot support his request for award of the AFResM because he did not serve the minimum time necessary to qualify for this award.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00026

    Original file (BC-2011-00026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPAPP verified the applicant served at Kadena Air Base (AB), Japan, from 20 Sep 67 to 22 Mar 68, for a total of six months and four days. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The documentation provided to date clearly shows flight time during both TDYs, in 67-68 and 68-69. Someone must know KC-135 crew chiefs flew with their aircraft on most missions at that time.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01582

    Original file (BC-2010-01582.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP states that neither the evidence of record nor the applicant’s military personnel record (MPR) substantiates that he served in Vietnam. Should the applicant provide sufficient evidence in the form of eyewitness statements, travel vouchers, or letters of evaluation to substantiate his eligibility for award of the VSM, we would be willing to reconsider his request. Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01284

    Original file (BC-2012-01284.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01284 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant’s records reflect he served on active duty from 9 Jul 63 to 7 Jul 67. There was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00464

    Original file (BC-2009-00464.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He flew over Vietnam many times during the Vietnam War as a plane refueler and should have been awarded the requested medals. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01861

    Original file (BC-2011-01861.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01861 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). In support of his request, the applicant submits copies of flight records, personal flight log records and documents extracted from his military...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03656

    Original file (BC-2010-03656.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03656 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he served in Vietnam. DPAPP states a review of the applicant’s master personnel records and the documentation he provided do not substantiate he had foreign service time in Vietnam. Therefore, we agree with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00021

    Original file (BC 2009 00021.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    d. The Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s available military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibit C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the AM, CRM, and VSM. The CRM is awarded to U.S. Air Force, U.S. Air Force Reserve service members, and service...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04655

    Original file (BC-2011-04655.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) which are included at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s requests...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03197

    Original file (BC-2008-03197.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Air Force Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). However, he has not provided sufficient relevant evidence in regards to his request for the Vietnam Service Medal and the Air Force Expeditionary Medal. JAMES W. RUSSELL, III Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2008-03170 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is...